For Reviewers

Cureon: Perspective Across Modern Medicine invites reviewers from all over the world. 

Reviewers form the cornerstone of the peer-review process, and their evaluations helps in maintaining  the quality of published research.
Therefore, we seek potential reviewers for Cureon who do not have conflicts of interest with the authors or reported research in the manuscripts they read.
In addition to this precaution, reviewers are required to disclose any conflicts with the evaluation of the paper, and this information is taken into account by the editors when decisions are made.

GUIDELINES FOR REVIWERS:

1. Expertise & Acceptance

  • Accept invitations only if the manuscript aligns with your area of expertise.

  • Decline promptly if not suitable or if you lack time to review thoroughly.

2. Conflicts of Interest

  • Disclose any potential conflicts (e.g., shared institution, collaborations, financial ties).

  • The editor will decide whether it is appropriate for you to proceed.

3. Timeliness & Deadlines

  • Reviews are generally due within 2–3 weeks.

  • If more time is needed, inform the editor immediately.

  • Suggest alternate reviewers if unable to accept.

4. Ethics

  • Report suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical research practices to the editor.

  • Check for confidentiality breaches, proper consent, and adherence to ethical standards.

5. Confidentiality

  • Treat manuscripts as strictly confidential.

  • Do not share or use unpublished material without permission.

  • Reviewer identity remains anonymous; do not reveal your name in comments.

6. Evaluation Criteria
When reviewing, consider:

  • Originality: Is the research novel, significant, and relevant?

  • Structure: Title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and conclusion — are they clear and aligned?

  • Methods & Data: Are they sound, transparent, and replicable?

  • Results & Discussion: Are findings accurate, well-presented, and supported by data?

  • Language & References: Is the manuscript understandable and properly referenced?

7. Writing the Review

  • Begin with a short summary of the manuscript.

  • Provide constructive, respectful feedback, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

  • Clearly specify required revisions (major or minor).

  • Make a recommendation: Accept / Revise / Reject.

  • The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.